Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:12:55 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@corbulon.video-collage.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -current and/or -amd64 (Re: new TCL vs. current-6) Message-ID: <20041214061255.GA20966@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200412120540.iBC5eu8p049469@corbulon.video-collage.com> References: <20041212023012.GB77070@dragon.nuxi.com> <200412120540.iBC5eu8p049469@corbulon.video-collage.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 12:40:56AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > [ Mikhail, please don't double post to both freebsd-amd64 and freebsd-current ]
>
> Why not? The problem is with -current, with -amd64, or with a combination.
> Neither list is a subset of the other, is it?
The problem is either machine(platform)-independant (MI) or
machine(platform)-dependant (MD).
If there was no difference between freebsd-current@ and freebsd-amd64@
then why do you think we have freebsd-{alpha,amd64,ia64,powerpc,sparc64}@ ??
There is no need to send most of us 2 copies of every thing... I dare say
99% of the people on this list also read freebsd-current with some
frequency (though maybe not as much as followin their favorate platform
lists).
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041214061255.GA20966>