From owner-cvs-all Wed Nov 13 12:15:30 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165F137B401; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:15:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732D443E7B; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:15:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.6/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gADKFSXD010253; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:15:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gADKEC7f010234; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:14:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:14:12 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Robert Watson , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/lukemftpd - Imported sources Message-ID: <20021113201412.GB10193@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Alexey Dokuchaev , Robert Watson , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org References: <200211120642.gAC6gfg0043798@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021112171203.GB59816@dragon.nuxi.com> <20021113111030.GA83756@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021113111030.GA83756@regency.nsu.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 05:10:30PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > AFAIC, regular ftpd is more secure and robust than lukemftpd. I've > seen reports in the past saying that performance issues in lukemftpd > are unavoidable WRT fixing them. Until we get performance and security > up to what we have in ftpd right now, IMHO it's rather meaningless to > compare features. > > FWIW, if one doesn't like stock ftpd, there are plenty in ports. Perhaps we should move this one to ports also. I am unable to call an ftpd "secure" that has no way to throttle anon users, nor control what they do. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message