From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 27 22:29:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A271065670 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7548FC1A for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29752 invoked by uid 399); 27 Oct 2009 22:29:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 27 Oct 2009 22:29:08 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4AE77437.4090700@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:29:11 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: benjsc@freebsd.org, sam@freebsd.org, thompsa@freebsd.org Subject: Can we turn off WPI_DEBUG X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:29:09 -0000 I cc'ed those who seem to have put the most/recent effort into sys/dev/wpi. Is there any objection to turning off WPI_DEBUG by default? it creates a lot of spam that the average user doesn't need. I use my 3945abg every day and haven't had any problems with it for ages so I think it's safe to say we're out of the period were debug by default is needed? Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/