Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:10:00 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> To: Keith Stevenson <k.stevenson@louisville.edu>, Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd and tcp-wrappers Message-ID: <v04220801b5213bbbbe89@[195.238.20.16]> In-Reply-To: <20000417133334.B10528@osaka.louisville.edu> References: <20000417122732.A1826@phy.hr> <20000417082136.C95086@osaka.louisville.edu> <20000417150004.A2376@phy.hr> <20000417090605.A2443@osaka.louisville.edu> <14587.10080.867467.456592@onceler.kcilink.com> <20000417133334.B10528@osaka.louisville.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:33 PM -0400 2000/4/17, Keith Stevenson wrote: > I think that we are all > in agreement, however, that there is no harm in building SSH against libwrap. So long as this fact is explicit and documented, I have no problem with this statement -- despite the fact that I recently cut myself off from one of my production systems for a while as I had installed TCP-Wrappers for a new application (and had not previously bothered to have a /etc/hosts.allow, since all the other applications gave me the ability to do the same sorts of things in other ways), and created a /etc/hosts.allow that was surprisingly over-restrictive. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blk@skynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04220801b5213bbbbe89>