From owner-freebsd-security Wed Dec 4 11:44:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA17992 for security-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA17987 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:44:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (alecto.physics.uiuc.edu [128.174.83.167]) by postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA77430; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 13:44:37 -0600 Received: by alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI) id NAA17903; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 13:43:47 -0600 From: igor@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (Igor Roshchin) Message-Id: <199612041943.NAA17903@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.8.4 questions... To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 13:43:45 -0600 (CST) Cc: agifford@infowest.com, freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199612041821.LAA10958@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Dec 4, 96 11:21:23 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Looking at www.sendmail.org I see that sendmail 8.8.4 has been > > released. > > Peter incorporated it into -current the day it was released, and Poul > merged almost all of it into 2.2 about 4 hours later. (He missed a > non-important change in makemap). > > Hey, what about 2.1.x ??? Is not 2.1.6. (which is claimed to be almost -stable) supposed to have "stable" sendmail ? Can anybody tell, if there was any real change in the port of 8.8.4 as compared to the original distribution of 8.8.4 ? Can I consider changing "Makefile"-s in all directories to what was in 8.8.3 ported to FreeBSD, changing pathes in smrsh.c and adding to free*.cf files to cf/cf to be enough ? Did I forget anything ? Thanks. IgoR aka StR