From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 10 2:51:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.esil.univ-mrs.fr (jiyu.esil.univ-mrs.fr [139.124.44.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C7F37B99C for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:51:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from la.firme@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: from esil.univ-mrs.fr (root@dopici.esil.univ-mrs.fr [139.124.32.246]) by mailhost.esil.univ-mrs.fr (8.9.3/ESIL/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id LAA62024 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:51:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <38C8D3BE.15F17D29@esil.univ-mrs.fr> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:51:42 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E9rome?= OUFELLA Organization: ESIL X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: 3.4 vs. 4.0 NFS Code performance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I need to use a quite big NFS server, serving ~120GB for ~200 clients, all OS's mixed (*BSD, Linux, HP-UX, IRIX, Solaris, Xterminals). Is it worth it to use the -current branch (-release on next monday perhaps?) for this important server, or should I rather use the 3.4-STABLE NFS implementation ? Thanks for all the tips you could give me. Jerome Oufella Network administration team ESIL To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message