From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 5 9:40: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED2637B403 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f65Ge3q67018; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107051640.f65Ge3q67018@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Barry Pederson Subject: Re: ports/27700: editors/nano 1.0.2 cut/paste patch needed Reply-To: Barry Pederson Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/27700; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Barry Pederson To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/27700: editors/nano 1.0.2 cut/paste patch needed Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 11:36:58 -0500 Mark Pulford wrote: > A Nano 1.0.3 release containing the bugfix is planned soon: > http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/3917/0/5912148/ "Soon" turned out to be like 3 weeks, but it does seem to be fixed now. The current port doesn't seem to have the problem, so this PR should probably be closed. Barry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message