From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 3 00:41:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D78E16A4FE for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB85643D5C for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:41:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so1960793pye for ; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:41:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AzxKvQb49BBLGFjckjGHMRGCSCA6BJWYTvJG0u8quwtowVibxrx8TPMUppq1//bUyzEUHb7ABzToyQDsADEhxbr4l60cZwykZsLfqI/L7Vrtg+khPrh6YxZvbm/6adf8EL6EC+6tZ6gRwViNqx8EgVADUj96DhosqSGPiASymhs= Received: by 10.35.60.15 with SMTP id n15mr6492232pyk; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.1 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2a41acea0609021741y481a04c0r42902166eaba78d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:41:53 -0700 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Andre Oppermann" In-Reply-To: <44F9384C.9070902@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2a41acea0609011551v40338539u4eef48d091dd12ab@mail.gmail.com> <44F9384C.9070902@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net , freebsd-current Subject: Re: RFC: TSO patch for current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:41:57 -0000 On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann wrote: > I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks > very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from > the other BSDs we have to remark this in the emails we send with > patches and the commit message (otherwise we get accused of 'stealing > without attribution'). I dont know that I'd call it a straight port, rather I was working from some prototype code that Prafulla had working back on 4.7, but I think at that time that he may have patterned it after NetBSD. I certainly don't claim any grand originality here, we stop the tcp stack from segmenting so the hardware can do it :), but I have no problem attributing the NetBSD crew. Cheers, Jack