From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Aug 30 12:50:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9760D37B43C; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA29147; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:50:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:50:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Alexey Zelkin Cc: John Baldwin , arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: aout-to-elf (was: Re: NO vs NO_) In-Reply-To: <20000830153500.B1040@ark.cris.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > BTW, one more question related to architecture design of our buildworld > system. Is there any reason to keep aout-to-elf upgrade chunks there > for 4.x and 5.x systems ? Maybe it's time to cleanup Makefiles for > HEAD and RELENG_4 ? I think it's time they died a death. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message