Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:15:48 GMT From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/89023: USE_BDB doesn't set name of Berkely dB, or location of the include directory Message-ID: <200511141715.jAEHFmfE039558@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200511141720.jAEHKEr9043582@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 89023
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: USE_BDB doesn't set name of Berkely dB, or location of the include directory
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Mon Nov 14 17:20:14 GMT 2005
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Scot W. Hetzel
>Release: FreeBSD 5.x-STABLE
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
I noticed that when the USE_BDB is used to provide a LIB_DEPENDS on a particular version of Berkley dB, that it doesn't define BDB_LIB_NAME or the BDB_INCLUDE_DIR. Without these variables defined the port maintainers that include USE_BDB in their ports, will have to define these variables for themselves.
I also noticed that the USE_BDB, doesn't honor the WITH_BDB_VER variable, instead it is left up to the ports maintainer to define the variable.
>How-To-Repeat:
Have a look at the security/cyrus-sasl2 and */kdesdk3 ports on how they are defining the location of the Berkley dB include directory and the name of the Berkley db library. And their use of WITH_BDB_VER.
>Fix:
See the attached patches in the next message:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511141715.jAEHFmfE039558>