From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 28 17: 1:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp-1.enteract.com (smtp-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3097237B424 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 17:01:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@tumbolia.com) Received: from shell-1.enteract.com (shell-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.40]) by smtp-1.enteract.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541E95F7C; Mon, 28 May 2001 19:01:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:01:37 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt X-X-Sender: To: "E.B. Dreger" Cc: Subject: Re: brainstorm: "intermediate" disk caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 28 May 2001, E.B. Dreger wrote: : :Of course, with 36 GB drives readily available, maybe I shouldn't worry :until I have a database larger than 72 GB. ;-) If you're really interested in database performance, remember "Spindles is good." Spreading your IO load over as many seperate disks, on as many independent IO channels as practical will improve performance. David -- dscheidt@tumbolia.com Bipedalism is only a fad. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message