Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:52:16 +0000 From: James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com> To: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: kqueue and libev Message-ID: <4766FDA0.9090509@mansionfamily.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170712171354o35cec019i75a78ed54cddfa55@mail.gmail.com> References: <4763A398.2040109@mansionfamily.plus.com> <47644BFE.3060003@elischer.org> <b1fa29170712151407v4eca6a78hda7dd75ab9367ca7@mail.gmail.com> <4766E92C.6020703@mansionfamily.plus.com> <b1fa29170712171354o35cec019i75a78ed54cddfa55@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kip Macy wrote: > Do you have a set of regression tests for libev? It sounds like they > would worth having to regression test kqueue. > I would have thought that libevent and libev should both the checked against kqueue. Also APR and everything else that has support. I'm not the author of libev though, so I'm the wrong guy to ask.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4766FDA0.9090509>