From owner-freebsd-security Tue Nov 6 2:30:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from sanyu1.sanyutel.com (sanyu1.sanyutel.com [216.250.215.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B74B37B405 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 02:30:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ksemat@localhost) by sanyu1.sanyutel.com (8.11.3/) with ESMTP id fA6AVXd01011; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:31:40 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: sanyu1.sanyutel.com: ksemat owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:31:33 +0300 (EAT) From: X-X-Sender: To: Carroll Kong Cc: Danny , Subject: Re: Qmail Relay In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105210136.026df1a0@netmail.home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org cat /etc/inetd.conf |grep 'qmail' You can use inetd to do qmail. I did this for sometime before changing to postfix. Noah. On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Carroll Kong wrote: > At 07:15 PM 11/5/01 -0500, Danny wrote: > > From reading all the FAQs and whatnot from DJB (who seems to be quite > >the arrogant prick) it doesn't appear that there is any way of using a > >q-mail server as a realy besides running his 'tcpserver'. Is this the > >case or can I use qmail as a realy without relying on anything besisides > >the 4.4 base system? > > http://www.qmail.org/man/man8/qmail-remote.html > > smtproutes seems to create a relay. Also, he highly suggests using > tcpserver for all qmail activity, relay or not. It really is not all that > hard to use, just use tcpserver. > > > > -Carroll Kong > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message