From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May 16 17:08:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA27878
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 May 1997 17:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA27873
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 May 1997 17:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1)
	id 0wSX33-0000XW-00; Fri, 16 May 1997 18:08:33 -0600
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: vim vs. nvi? 
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 May 1997 17:06:25 EDT."
		<19970516170625.60057@crh.cl.msu.edu> 
References: <19970516170625.60057@crh.cl.msu.edu>  
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 18:08:32 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0wSX33-0000XW-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <19970516170625.60057@crh.cl.msu.edu> Charles Henrich writes:
: Has any thought been given to importing vim as FreeBSD's vi instead of nvi?
: 
: I've found that its syntax coloring improves life a remarkable amount!

Isn't vim already a port?

Warner