Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 01:59:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 275803] dns/djbdns: restore port Message-ID: <bug-275803-7788-0wzZs3QT9e@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-275803-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-275803-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D275803 Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |diizzy@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #12 from Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> --- As in (re-)adding ~unaudited, unmaintained software to the tree and offer i= t as "safe to use" and not moving on to using software which is actively maintai= ned and offers functionality that's relevant today? Are you willing to take responsibility if end users ends up with damages and/or potential data loss knowing that this is considered bad practice in general? Do we need a fresh variant of the 4chan hack (or rather underlaying cause(s= ) of it) for this to be taken into serious consideration? Nothing stops you from having this in your local ports tree, using overlays (via Poudriere). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-275803-7788-0wzZs3QT9e>