From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 18 03:40:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BA51065672; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55C38FC15; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0I3eHQG071221; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:40:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0I3eHmi071220; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:40:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:40:17 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Attilio Rao Message-ID: <20100118034017.GA71183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20100117.142200.321689433999177718.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> <20100117.152835.119882392487126976.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> <20100117195838.GA69278@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <3bbf2fe11001171859h278b7e74p898d219697e3802e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe11001171859h278b7e74p898d219697e3802e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kohji Okuno Subject: Re: Bug about sched_4bsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:40:12 -0000 On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:59:52AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > 2010/1/17 Steve Kargl : > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 03:28:35PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: > >> > >> Could you check sched_4bsd.patch, please? > >> > > > > Kohji, > > > > I do not have the proper skills to evaluate your patch. > > Hopefully, one of the scheduler gurus can read over > > your analysis and patch, because I use the 4BSD scheduler > > on all my systems due to ULE's poor performance. > > Did you fill any PR with datas or mailed MLs? If yes, can you point to > the e-mail reports/PR you did? > I have communicated directly with Jeff about the problem. There are also emails to freebsd-current about the issue [1]. In fact, I setup one of the nodes on my cluster to given Jeff root access. Unfortunately, Jeff like many others including myself have limited time. [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=199808+0+archive/2009/freebsd-current/20091018.freebsd-current -- Steve