Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 May 1997 22:11:30 +0100 (BST)
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
To:        Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br>
Cc:        fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NFS between 2.2.1 and 2.1.7.1
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970511220145.310E-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <199705112054.RAA11556@gaia.coppe.ufrj.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 May 1997, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote:

> Just guessing: Would it work if I simply copied the sys/nfs subdir from
> -current to my 2.2 branch ?

I'm afraid that won't work.  The filesystems interfaces have diverged
somewhat between 2.2 and 3.0.

> 
> // If you are not already, you should track the 2.2 branch with CVSup and
> // watch for the NFS fixes when I commit then (in a week or two probably).
> 
> I have always followed FreeBSD-stable/src, with the ftp mirror package.
> 
> If there's something similar for 2.2, I'll follow it too.

That would probably work.  You should try CVSup though - its a much more
efficient use of bandwidth and its really easy to use.  Read section 16.2
in the handbook.

> 
> // trace and maybe we can figure out what is broken.
> 
> It was sending write requests, and receiving no answer at all.  Maybe a
> problem on the server (2.1.7) side ?

Hmm.  I just fixed a bug like that in 3.0 but that bug was definately not
present in 2.1.x.  I am not supporting the NFS in 2.1.x at all really, so
I don't know what it could be.

The NFS in 2.2 and 3.0 is really much better than 2.1.  It supports the
newer version 3 protocol which has much better write performance (2-3
Mb/sec on my unloaded 100baseTX test network).  I am also actively
supporting this version and will try to fix any bugs which I can
reproduce.

> 
> I also used the dumbtimer option with no success.  Now I'm trying with
> tcp mounts, and seems to be much more stable.  I'm up for more than one
> hour, stressing the NFS system, and had no system locks until now.
> 
> Of course, it's slower.  :(

Like I said, watch for the next batch of fixes to 2.2's NFS and see if it
helps.  You might consider subscribing to the cvs-sys@freebsd.org mailing
list so that you can see when fixes are committed to the tree.

--
Doug Rabson				Mail:  dfr@nlsystems.com
Nonlinear Systems Ltd.			Phone: +44 181 951 1891




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970511220145.310E-100000>