Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 05:33:16 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New/Updated port Message-ID: <20140517033316.GA2341@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <5376C71F.90604@sorbs.net> References: <53763B1A.2020007@sorbs.net> <CAN6yY1ua7P2TB7tYMp=c=cet9oWFkM6=epMdkS%2Bt2x8L=vL=gw@mail.gmail.com> <5376C71F.90604@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > Set the PR as an "Update" > > OOps put it as 'maintainer update' rather than 'update' ... is that > wrong or is it as good as? It's a maintainer update, if the update was submitted by the current maintainer -- or with the intent to change the maintainer and the old maintainer already approved that change. Have you asked the current maintainer if he's fine if you take over ? So, technically, 'update' is correct, 'maintainer-update' is probably not correct. > I just linked my URL rather than trying to persuade my browser to 'shar' > it... That's ok 8-) I'll be on the road the next week, but I'll have a look if it's still open at that time. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140517033316.GA2341>