From owner-cvs-gnu Wed Aug 16 17:27:37 1995 Return-Path: cvs-gnu-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id RAA06767 for cvs-gnu-outgoing; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 17:27:37 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA06761 ; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 17:27:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA14661; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 17:26:01 -0700 To: Peter Wemm cc: Ollivier Robert , "Rodney W. Grimes" , CVS-commiters@freefall.FreeBSD.org, cvs-gnu@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/cvs import.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Aug 1995 08:10:09 +0800." Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 17:26:01 -0700 Message-ID: <14659.808619161@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: cvs-gnu-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I don't know.. Is it time to start thinking about this sort of thing a > bit more seriously? Well, I'm certainly not keen to jump into anything that may still be half-baked, but I'm certainly not alone in saying that if it worked, it would make the lives of people like myself, David and Joerg (who REALLY suffers from serious lag in the translatlantic lines) significantly easier. If I could just work away in my own local tree, test things a LOT more easily (which also would improve the quality of my commits) and then commit directly from the tested location, well, it would definitely improve my life and also avoid problems with bogus patches making what was committed not quite what was intended. It's a real pain the way it is now and especially failure prone at 4am.. :-) I've talked to Chris a bit about his own use of RCVS and the sentiment seems to be that now that it's all working for me, he'd never go back. Jordan