From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 23 13:26:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF1116A4CF
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:26:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from debian.akroteq.com (rdbck-static-72.palmer.mtaonline.net
	[12.17.141.72])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B72943D55
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:26:12 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from andy@firman.us)
Received: from andy by debian.akroteq.com with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CWagH-0007z9-Q7
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 04:26:05 -0900
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 04:26:05 -0900
From: Andy Firman <andy@firman.us>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20041123132605.GA30666@akroteq.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Subject: p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.1_1 performance?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Andy Firman <andy@firman.us>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:26:12 -0000


I just learned how to upgrade my ports to get the
latest clamav installed.  I see that SA 3.0 is
available for my 4.10 stable box.

Is anyone running this on a box with 10,000+ emails
per day?  If so, how is SA 3.0 performance?
I have read it can take up lots of memory and CPU.

Comments?


Thanks,
Andy