From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 11 12:27:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12473 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:27:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA12463 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:27:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA21699; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:27:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802112027.MAA21699@implode.root.com> To: bell@reillyplating.com (Jerry Bell) cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, mmadio@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Poor performance of SAMBA In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Feb 1998 19:19:45 CST." <9802111919.AA24915@[10.0.0.2]> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:27:03 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >I wasn't very impressed with the performance of Samba on FreeBSD either, >until I found out about these changes to smb.conf: >add >socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 SO_RCVBUF=16384 The important option above is TCP_NODELAY; the send/receive socket buffer sizes default to 16K in FreeBSD, so those should have no affect. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe questions" in the body of the message