From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 29 22:10:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9AE16A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:10:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09CC43D54 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:10:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3219846B87 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:10:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:12:46 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: performance@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20050425181101.Y74930@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: <20050429231211.J31768@fledge.watson.org> References: <20050417134448.L85588@fledge.watson.org> <20050425114546.O74930@fledge.watson.org> <20050425181101.Y74930@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Memory allocation performance/statistics patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:10:03 -0000 On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Robert Watson wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Robert Watson wrote: > >> I now have updated versions of these patches, which correct some >> inconsistencies in approach (universal use of curcpu now, for example), >> remove some debugging code, etc. I've received relatively little >> performance feedback on them, and would appreciate it if I could get some. >> :-) Especially as to whether these impact disk I/O related workloads, >> useful macrobenchmarks, etc. The latest patch is at: >> >> >> http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20050425-uma-mbuf-malloc-critical.diff > > FYI: For those set up to track perforce, you can find the contents of > this patch in: > > //depot/user/rwatson/percpu/... > > In addition, that branch also contains diagnostic micro-benchmarks in > the kernel to measure the cost of various synchronization operations, > memory allocation operations, etc, which can be queried using "sysctl > test". FYI: I've now committed the UMA changes from this patch. Robert N M Watson