From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov 16 15:56:42 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3500E16A4CE; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru
	[195.34.32.123])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3F41643FCB; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:56:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from ciam.ru (ppp132-44.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.132.44])
	by hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 54CABF8827; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:56:39 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Message-ID: <3FB80EB7.4070902@ciam.ru>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:56:39 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rich Winkel <rich@math.missouri.edu>
References: <200311161817.hAGIH9xr075385@pencil.math.missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200311161817.hAGIH9xr075385@pencil.math.missouri.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: p5 ports don't respect LOCALBASE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:56:42 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:56:42 -0000

Rich Winkel wrote:

> According to Lowell Gilbert:
> 
>>Rich Winkel <rich@math.missouri.edu> writes:
>>>The p5 ports seem especially bad about this.  I understand the
>>>need for perl to be able to find its local packages, so after I

There are ways to find perl packages without expecting them in LOCALBASE.

---
Sem.