From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 21 14:39:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (cust-P5-R2-63.POOL.ESR.SJO.wwc.com [206.112.105.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896CE37B403; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:39:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6LLdVm01080; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:39:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200107212139.f6LLdVm01080@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Andrew Boothman Cc: Mike Smith , janb@cs.utep.edu, "Daniel C. Sobral" , Stefan Molnar , Marek Gorka , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 and 6G RAM In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Jul 2001 18:44:48 BST." <3B59BF90.7070200@cream.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:39:30 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > So, someone wanting to implement this in FreeBSD isn't starting from > square one? That depends on how you number your squares. > Can the NetBSD stuff be fairly easily ported to FreeBSD, or is their VM > system too funky? It's just different. But no, the NetBSD work doesn't immediately translate. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message