From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 00:56:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9605537B404; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.unixguru.nl (mosibi.demon.nl [212.238.240.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51E64400E; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:56:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richard@unixguru.nl) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.10.4]) by mail.unixguru.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h647u7pW074502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Jul 2003 09:56:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from richard@unixguru.nl) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 09:56:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Arends To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20030703230809.GA5102@sunbay.com> Message-ID: <20030704095541.G68763@mail.unixguru.nl> References: <20030704003539.A26966@mail.unixguru.nl> <20030703225813.GA4432@sunbay.com> <20030703230209.GA4938@sunbay.com> <20030703230809.GA5102@sunbay.com> X-message-flag: Get yourself a real mail client! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Accepted-File-Formats: ASCII .rtf .ps - *NO* MS Office files please. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -2.8: EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.33 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: who am i X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 07:56:20 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Hello, > > Doh, forgot to mention: the following patch fixes it for me. This indeed fixes it. Thanks! Regards, Richard. ---- Paul Vixie in an interview with Sendmail.net: Now that the Internet has the full spectrum of humanity as users, the technology is showing its weakness: it was designed to be used by friendly, smart people. Spammers, as an example of a class, are neither friendly nor smart.