Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:38:58 -0800 From: Jim Long <freebsd-questions@umpquanet.com> To: Paul Procacci <pprocacci@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtIO/ipfw/natd throughput problem in hosted VM Message-ID: <Zbfwwnb0IupcVsVl@sfo.umpquanet.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFbbPui_RX%2Bk%2BtFd18yN2MHMfSAQSqqEjPLo3GY12AchnN0eCg@mail.gmail.com> References: <ZbfkhQXCobk0jKBg@sfo.umpquanet.com> <CAFbbPui_RX%2Bk%2BtFd18yN2MHMfSAQSqqEjPLo3GY12AchnN0eCg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:54:49PM -0500, Paul Procacci wrote: > > The most glaringly obvious thing to me is to use in-kernel nat instead of > natd. > Packets won't have to leave the kernel at that point. > It's detailed in ipfw(8). > > ~Paul Thank you very much! Your tip plus some cribbing from: https://www.neelc.org/posts/freebsd-ipfw-nat/ seems to have taken care of it. Regards, Jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Zbfwwnb0IupcVsVl>