From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 31 09:01:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA20152 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 09:01:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from oldnews.quick.net ([207.212.170.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA20119; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 09:01:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from donegan@oldnews.quick.net) Received: (from donegan@localhost) by oldnews.quick.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) id JAA26749; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 09:00:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 09:00:49 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven P. Donegan" To: Mark Murray cc: The Hermit Hacker , "Daniel C. Sobral" , "Jonathan M. Bresler" , committers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Postfix is coming. new uid, gid required. In-Reply-To: <199812311622.SAA60127@greenpeace.grondar.za> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 31 Dec 1998, Mark Murray wrote: > "Steven P. Donegan" wrote: > > Not to flame at all OK, now I think I'm going to put a mild heat on... neither postfix, nor it's 'older' name vmailer - appear to exist in ports, so I see no possibility that any significant number of FreeBSD users has played with this code - thus it's definitely not ready to replace anything. Add to ports - yes. the errata on the code on the postfix site indicates that it is beta, has definite known bugs (of what significance I don't know). And, although the author is well known and respected, I won't want to run such mission critical code without a long-term tire-kicking process. A definite no to this code replacing anything for a while... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message