From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 07:54:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51BC106564A for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9CC8FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pool-96-229-186-65.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [96.229.186.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q1I7sb8f047766; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:54:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <201202180721.q1I7LHxd071111@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:54:36 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201202180721.q1I7LHxd071111@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: Robert Bonomi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One or Four? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:54:39 -0000 On 17 February 2012, at 23:21, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> =46rom owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 19:56:00 2012 >> From: Doug Hardie >> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:50:44 -0800 >> To: FreeBSD Mailing List >> Subject: Re: One or Four? >>=20 >>=20 >> On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave wrote: >>> We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the "old" style = default=20 >>> with 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition = and=20 >>> swap. >>=20 >>=20 >> I only run servers and set them up with /, /usr, and swap. Other = partitions=20 >> are placed on other disks with typically one partition per disk. I = link /var >> and /tmp into /usr. >=20 > That last is a *BAD*IDEA*(tm). There _are_ programs that assume that = /var/tmp > and /usr/tme are *different* places -- and will attempt to create = 'distinct'=20 > files _with_the_same_name_ in the two diretories. I am sure you can find programs that presume anything you want. I have = never seen one that does that. If I did find one, it would be easy to = correct that misguided thinking.