Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:50:29 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Few how-it-works questions Message-ID: <d0rb-soyi-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <73366a94-238a-ed9a-5dee-d5955525e851@gjunka.com> (Grzegorz Junka's message of "Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:34:25 %2B0000") References: <73366a94-238a-ed9a-5dee-d5955525e851@gjunka.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com> writes: > 1. Recommended way of upgrading ports is "poudriere ports -p local > -u", right? But this always gets me the latest version, in which some > ports may not compile, depending on my luck. I know I can use SVN to > checkout a specific version of ports instead, but is it possible to > find out in which SVN version which ports are compiling and which are > not? In other words, can I open the history of builds of FreeBSD ports > on the build servers and check which ports are building in a specific > SVN version, then checkout that version to build on my server? Navigate from https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?type=3Dpackage&all=3D1 to get a list of SVN revisions built then check build log for each until you get one from a successful build. Inspecting /latest-per-pkg/<PKGBASE>/ on a package builder may help to filter results more quickly based on PKGVERSION but it doesn't change on every SVN revision. > 2. Every time poudriere builds a new set of packages, it deletes those > which have changed in ports or for which the options have changed, > then it tries to build them again. But because the ports change, some > may no longer build. In that case I am left with no packages to > install on a system unless I am lucky enough to be able to cleanly > build all ports again. What is the preferred strategy to maintain old > packages until a new set is build correctly? See KEEP_OLD_PACKAGES=3Dyes in poudriere.conf.sample. > > 3. When a package doesn't build because of a patch error: > > =3D=3D=3D>=C2=A0 Patching for ImageMagick6-6.9.10.14,1 > =3D=3D=3D>=C2=A0 Applying FreeBSD patches for ImageMagick6-6.9.10.14,1 > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to config/policy.xml.rej > =3D> FreeBSD patch patch-config_policy.xml failed to apply cleanly. > *** Error code 1 > > Is this a problem with the ports tree, the upstream package, or some > other package? There's no generic answer. It can happen if the ports tree is inconsistent, the upstream source have changed but downstream maintainer forgot to rebase or a master port updated but its slave wasn't tested. > In other words, can that problem be fixed without having an updated > version of the port Yes, by cherry-picking desired commit(s) fixing the issue.=20 > Are patches always kept in the ports tree or sometimes they may be > kept separately (e.g. in another repo versioned independently)? Depends on the port. Usually, patches are under files/ but backports or extra features maybe defined via PATCH_SITES or EXTRA_PATCHES. In rare cases patches maybe *within* distfile.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d0rb-soyi-wny>