From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 25 22:24:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA06613 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 22:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA06608 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 22:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2) id AAA20122; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 00:24:38 -0500 Received: from p75.mixcom.com(198.137.186.25) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma020117; Sat Apr 26 05:24:29 1997 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970426002707.00b40790@mixcom.com> X-Sender: sysop@mixcom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 00:27:08 -0500 To: The Classiest Man Alive From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: VFAT 32 support in msdosfs Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 11:54 PM 4/25/97 -0400, The Classiest Man Alive wrote: >>Note: From what I've heared, Windows95 that supports VFAT isn't even shipped >>any more. So this will probably be dying out soon.. :-) >> > >Where'd you hear that? Doesn't seem like Microsoft to just break the chain >of backward compatibility like that. Unless NT will have support for it, it will die (eventually) as 95 and NT move together. At least I hope so... but then they say "wish in..." Best to drop this one off the list. ------------------------------------------- Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator jeff@mixcom.net MIX Communications Serving the Internet since 1990