From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 30 12:22:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F946106568B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leccine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35498FC16 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so1779992fxm.36 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:22:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+WKTDfcVpihVTmu8jAIM7gficyaAOgprVP9WEaPcgVQ=; b=Ze49/srR9pQVCUZYkD+cuyu6U8qSY5LM4/ZD22OXrZ3ok6zftwr9taZUEpdycAptNY YWkV0NvBsjnX8Qs851wnsIPBAT6VNGHTm2tfLsvXWCMRchFMlIOnhCQvMwN66YuVNj++ SoNntJX2ehilhglOV9wQFJg8MYaidvGJFEgNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rPJgV3YA+3m+pYeH5K0Psp05/RaoCAJNRBFT/NhVF+J9KvM+k0AfQzEvsHzHt9Vt6m Cx8ZmvJxgPmezu9/uDTq3wlIAwcfM8AcHF6VM1W4xGNOlD9R4Iz8ow0RHRZ6msa0UeW1 WUhze09rdQdeYE59jyX+P9D/Ee2pLogfplxbc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.3.19 with SMTP id 19mr5250249bkl.151.1254313326521; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:22:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6e38aed80909300449p24928d25v2a34d24f309fa808@mail.gmail.com> References: <200909290226.CAA28246@sopwith.solgatos.com> <689d500ec8c95542a53440b8a23ae773@mail.liquidphlux.com> <6e38aed80909300449h61d671a3i2281eb875f649eb6@mail.gmail.com> <6e38aed80909300449p24928d25v2a34d24f309fa808@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:22:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SXN0duFu?= To: S4mmael Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:22:08 -0000 have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff? you might have overlooked it. yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :) On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael wrote: > > Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think > > this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read > the > > documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is > > available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark. > What about FreeBSD 7.2? All debug featureas are 100% off in this > version, but test results are the same as in 8.0 > Besides, UFS is known to be not the fastest FS. So, there is no reason > to be suprised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- the sun shines for all