From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 14 17:42:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92699106566B;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:42:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from artemrts@ukr.net)
Received: from ffe6.ukr.net (ffe6.ukr.net [195.214.192.56])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AFE8FC15;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:42:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
	s=ffe; 
	h=Date:Message-Id:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	bh=vZ8cyX2LIWxbToUFyWs0WaAveZL9B2DPxFfbHW9b45g=; 
	b=rCNNl2ezobVZ9Sd6Onj7qh2sVdK7IJgfSlAOkXzL5hwODpkC+S41yJ4Rl0jxmwXqFGZO91gwTe18IMpYRNNzjG24AQtNWDjxLaK0wPXcIvy0RluyiXGWOoEXJJ4GtWIDIm8jWKJL8Ajrf/5Phco2ee8tVkpfk15YIaPBWBp9U4I=;
Received: from mail by ffe6.ukr.net with local ID 1RQ0Xf-0001H4-FS
	; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:41:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
In-Reply-To: <CAPBZQG2DcyO4=zXiv0AH5RP63uWPT-_k_uV-4XFMHPOPkhsMVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <28157.1321285207.10515527080858615808@ffe17.ukr.net>
	<CAPBZQG2DcyO4=zXiv0AH5RP63uWPT-_k_uV-4XFMHPOPkhsMVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?WINDOWS-1251?B?RXJtYWwgTHUaaQ==?= <eri@freebsd.org>
From: =?WINDOWS-1251?B?wujy4Ovo6SDC6+Dk6Ozo8O7i6Pc=?= <artemrts@ukr.net>
X-Mailer: freemail.ukr.net 4.0
X-Originating-Ip: [195.200.251.79]
Message-Id: <3260.1321292519.4280141174806937600@ffe6.ukr.net>
X-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:41:59 +0200
Cc: "freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: PF + dummynet
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
	\(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:42:01 -0000



 --- Original message ---
 From: "Ermal Lui" <eri@freebsd.org>
 To: "Виталий Владимирович" <artemrts@ukr.net>
  Date: 14 November 2011, 19:15:31
 Subject: Re: PF + dummynet
 


> 2011/11/14 Виталий Владимирович <artemrts@ukr.net>:
> >
> >  Hi.
> >  Some years ago I have read in freebsd-pf@ that exist patch PF+dummynet from eri@. Now I am searching on Internet but nothing except this: pfsense-tools / patches / RELENG_9_0 on GitHUB. Is anybody use it with FreeBSD 9? I have applied dummynet.RELENG_9.diff but without results.
> >
> Well can you be more clear on your findings?
> 
> That patch should work the same as the patch for RELENG_8_1 that is in
> use on pfSense 2.0 and throughly tested.
> 

 Should I use some another patches or dummynet.RELENG_9.diff only?