Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 22:19:00 +0100 From: Alex Burke <alexjeffburke@gmail.com> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding bsdiff to the base system Message-ID: <a8b8bb510504011319da12ee@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <p0621020fbe735b39c6b3@128.113.24.47> References: <424B3AAB.6090200@wadham.ox.ac.uk> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050401045710.51321C-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20050401134347.GA6676@Pandora.MHoerich.de> <20050401152805.GA4564@dan.emsphone.com> <p0621020fbe735b39c6b3@128.113.24.47>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, At first I was also confused by the names...I agree with Garance, I think bindiff and binpatch are much better more descriptive names. Just my humble two cents, Alex Burke. Garance wrote: > I was also confused by the names at first. How about just > 'bindiff' and 'binpatch'? These do sound like useful utilities > to add, now that I understand what they are... > > -- > Garance Alistair Drosehn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a8b8bb510504011319da12ee>