Date: Wed, 17 May 95 15:49:00 PDT From: Plyaskin Sergey <splyaski@cmp.com> To: questions <questions@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Pine port???? Message-ID: <2FBA7DBA@mailgate.cmp.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I did not try to compile pine on the stock 2.0R system. However, on my 950495-SNAP system it compiled just fine without any trouble. You only need to make minor and obvious modifications to the Makefile. If you want, I can give you the pine binary (sorry, FTP only - it's about 2MB big). Serge -splyaski@cmp.com ---------- From: owner-freebsd-questions To: questions Subject: Pine port???? Date: Wednesday, May 17, 1995 12:44PM I have recently upgraded from our old 486 running FreeBSD 1.0 to our new 90 mhz pentium running FreeBSD 2.0 :-) I am <<trying>> to install Pine3.91. I could not get it to compile on our old 486 with 1.0 . So I waited until The new system was up and running. I ran the makefile from the FreeBSD 2.0 cd and it ftp'd the tar.z file and then after I copied the pine directory from "ports" onto my hard drive it began to compile. Pico works great but Pine did not compile at all. I read something from cdrom.com that said that users of FreeBSD 2.0R or earlyer had to have some sort of new tree installed in order to make the ports work. Is this correct. I am a unix newbie amd have some other newbies helping me and I wouldmlike to know if I am missing anything to install Pine3.91 I know it is a pretty vague question... I am willing to spend all the time needed to make it work. Can you please let nme know if the stuff on thye cd is valid or do I need to compile it some other way. Thanks for all your help... I only need to get Pine to work so my boss (a mac only guy) will get off my back because he says elm is to hard to use :-(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2FBA7DBA>