Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:29:24 -0400
From:      "James E. Housley" <jim@thehousleys.net>
To:        "freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: SMP and the Celeron
Message-ID:  <37A1FD14.CC862D4E@thehousleys.net>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907301022080.12170-100000@harlie.bfd.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Eric J. Schwertfeger" wrote:
> 
> Between this and the rumors that Intel is going to disable Celeron SMP in
> the next Celeron revision, I have to consider Celeron SMP an interesting
> experiment, but not something you'd actually use in a production
> environment.  It's a good way to experiment with SMP for SMP's sake, but
> unless you're doing the kind of stuff that does fit in the L2 cache, the
> performance gain isn't what you'd hope for.
> 
I would agree almost completely.  I am running an overclocked dual celeron system for a "local production" server.  With one of my initial goal of getting SMP running affordably.  The next step of 2xPIII-? processors is more afforable down the line where I only have to buy them and not them PLUS everything else.

Jim
-- 
 James E. Housley                            PGP:   1024/03983B4D
 System Supply, Inc.                         2C 3F 3A 0D A8 D8 C3 13
 Pager: pagejim@notepage.com                 7C F0 B5 BF 27 8B 92 FE 

"The box said 'Requires Windows 95, NT, or better,' so I installed FreeBSD"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37A1FD14.CC862D4E>