Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:31:28 +0000
From:      Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com>
To:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Problem with poudriere after updating to FreeBSD 12
Message-ID:  <SN1PR20MB210986AB5BBC87A32BBDDC0B80BC0@SN1PR20MB2109.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <8546f6bd-12d0-3ff3-eb7d-c2a4a27d4abd@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <SN1PR20MB21092F6DBC8DD6E67A22E8BD80BC0@SN1PR20MB2109.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <45ca0b0f-59f9-d169-1af7-fa09d99012ec@infracaninophile.co.uk> <SN1PR20MB2109A84D49155C374FB47EFC80BC0@SN1PR20MB2109.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <f90cd8a7-5436-0c86-36b3-e71029497740@infracaninophile.co.uk> <SN1PR20MB2109A552BDDFD083DAC1A75380BC0@SN1PR20MB2109.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <8546f6bd-12d0-3ff3-eb7d-c2a4a27d4abd@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:07:47 +0000, Matthew Seaman stated:

>On 17/12/2018 15:02, Carmel NY wrote:
>> I don't have that file. I do have a "/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos
>>=20
>> ## poudriere repository file
>>=20
>> poudriere: {
>>     url:"file:///usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/12amd64-default",
>>     mirror_type: NONE,
>>     enabled: yes
>> }
>>=20
>> Actually, I just changed it. It was set to the old package directory. BT=
W,
>> is this actually listed anywhere? I never noticed it in the "UPDATING to
>> FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE info.
>>  =20
>
>That's your customized local configuration, not part of a default setup,=20
>so it wouldn't be covered in UPDATING.
>
>Is there a Wiki page or something on running poudriere locally?  That=20
>would be the place to document things you should do for handling a major=20
>version bump.
>
>	Cheers,
>
>	Matthew
I don't think there is Matthew. In the next week or so, I write up a paper =
on
what I encountered when updating to a new major OS and using "poudriere".
When I complete it, I'll send it onto you for your perusal, editing,
etcetera. I think we could come up with something worthwhile.

Right now, as far as I can tell, there is a lack of specifics on the subjec=
t,
and what is available is scattered all over the place.

--=20
Carmel



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SN1PR20MB210986AB5BBC87A32BBDDC0B80BC0>