From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 21:15:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A4D16A45D for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD9643E42 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so16551wxc for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:42:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cPxcaGQXLxw++mylhmgpdQ4RIcEnuhV/iB1Qa+dYQEoWeAUalcvbRcSitfMY6xLF7LGacMXhaiRmjbmTva8bWMbcQAoOmyZBoypszPZ/LvkIuvo1u6JcWrOoEfq/wZWMPaoMQEjgS3iyd5uH0JZUScwZ7ftuwlw8ut6SzhdFvQU= Received: by 10.70.11.2 with SMTP id 2mr1749026wxk; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:41:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.58.15 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:41:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:41:58 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Joseph Vella" In-Reply-To: <200603281234.11850.satyam@sklinks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200603281234.11850.satyam@sklinks.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why are so many people using 4.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:15:20 -0000 On 3/28/06, Joseph Vella wrote: > I notice a lot of references to version 4.x. Is there any overwhelming r= eason > why its use seems to be still popular. I'm wanting to set up a server (j= ust > for play) on my home network using a PII machine. Am I better off using = an > older version for such old equipment? If so, do any particular versions > stand out? Because the headache of upgrading isn't worth the advantages in many cases. If you're installing from scratch, go with 6.x, if you already a functional (and security patched!) 4.x server have (and needn't ye any of the features of 6.x) no need there is upgrading to do. -- --