Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:20:48 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: shih@math.jussieu.fr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap vs cvsup Message-ID: <C9EE7BBB-F749-4461-9A35-3D9CD09BAC75@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr> References: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 9 Jan 2006, at 09:01, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all > > What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ? cvsup only runs on a very limited set of architectures and forces you to build or fetch INDEX files yourself. Having said that, it's useful in non ports/ situations too. Ceri [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDxRREme8yCsQvJJ0RAuDYAJ0bHOPQss8hG0qdq3C9ejcsYvtV2QCfSWpb UTHKWTAlKnCFGZZf/0cWcVM= =N268 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C9EE7BBB-F749-4461-9A35-3D9CD09BAC75>