Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 May 2001 22:24:41 -0500
From:      Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>
To:        "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Cc:        Patrick Li <pat@databits.net>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1
Message-ID:  <20010512222441.N29602@casimir.physics.purdue.edu>
In-Reply-To: <021c01c0db5a$6b946200$931576d8@inethouston.net>; from dwcjr@inethouston.net on Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:11:36PM -0500
References:  <XFMail.010512163006.jdp@polstra.com> <01b601c0db3c$5b02ba40$931576d8@inethouston.net> <002d01c0db41$70cdda30$0200a8c0@bsod> <01c201c0db57$7273c000$931576d8@inethouston.net> <004f01c0db59$9e6fe740$0200a8c0@bsod> <021c01c0db5a$6b946200$931576d8@inethouston.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:11:36PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> I'm on your side, but the people who are having problems accepting it are
> the people who can actually change it, so that's the current problem.

FWIW, I think keeping "samba-devel" is a fine idea.  People who can't be
bothered to make their own evaluation are stuck.

Changing the name of the port for the sake of avoiding these people
sounds like a bad idea to me.

-- 
wca

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010512222441.N29602>