From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 5 09:12:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D06616A4CF for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:12:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A765343FFB for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:12:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kaeru@pd.jaring.my) Received: from unknown (HELO ?219.95.242.150?) (khairil?yusof@219.95.242.150 with plain) by smtp1.mail.vip.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2003 17:12:27 -0000 From: Khairil Yusof To: Jeremy Messenger In-Reply-To: References: <20031104220929.M10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jTsMl5fpK8w23Tue8A5F" Message-Id: <1068052331.79701.12.camel@wolverine.home.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 01:12:12 +0800 cc: Jeff Roberson cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 17:12:34 -0000 --=-jTsMl5fpK8w23Tue8A5F Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 17:04, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > I don't get any mouse lag anymore in the 'cd /usr/src ; make clean ; make=20 > cleandir' and the beginner of 'portupgrade -ra'. I did the hard test; I=20 > have Gnome2, Opera 7 (linux version), several gvim, several gnome-terminal=20 > tabs, pan and even use totem to watch a movie (700mb) in full screen mode=20 > ;-).. While watching the movie and it doesn't get lag that much only while=20 > unpack the large tarballs like mozilla. While the build and clean, it only=20 > has very very little lag like one to two time(s) but the rest are pretty=20 > smooth. The mouse doesn't get any lag at all. Yup.. Latest SCHED_ULE commit did it for me. My system now is fast and responsive. I ran similar tests, and everything ran quite smoothly with Gnome Desktop environment. Quite drastic change, system was practically unusable before this with SCHED_ULE. However, under higher CPU usage (90%+) and load (>2) the mouse starts to feel sluggish. While still responsive enough to use, it still slows down enough to be noticeable. psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 Dual Pentium III Intel 440BX =20 > BTW: I don't use KSE because of Nvidia driver. Confirmed. It now works just fine (so far) with KSE. --=-jTsMl5fpK8w23Tue8A5F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/qS9rDAqnLW/+/X8RAkv9AJ4tp6QPUqVJ6RO8sYr2oPltYsPzowCdEvGk iGBtHxtSI7LQz2cCCdE+emY= =I3cS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jTsMl5fpK8w23Tue8A5F--