Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 17:04:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Coleman <chrisc@vmunix.com> To: cliff ainsworth III <cliff@cliffsworld.com> Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FW: Re: NetBSD: Certified mom-ready(Jordan) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904191641320.4050-100000@vnode.vmunix.com> In-Reply-To: <371B941D.3CEF051D@cliffsworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> the OpenBSD list involved daemon news. I think they complained that it > was too FreeBSD centric. I have worked hard to clear up this misconception. I have made some personal invitations to the openbsd lists to solicit their articles. They have been sending in articles in much more frequently now. I have even asked BSDI to join the Daemon News. I have had a small response, yet it looks hopeful. > IMHO..maybe Open/NetBSDers should subscribe to our advocacy list and > learn a little. I don't mean that as a negative or omnipotent comment > either. What helps us should help them and vice versa. Its also possible > that it is easier for us to get great ideas into action because of our > iuser base as compared to theirs. Do we have a number of users compared > to Open/NetBSD users? I'd like to see alot more cooperation between the *BSD groups. A gain for any one of them is a boost for all of us. I already have written two editorials on how *BSD needs to get it act together and cooperate in advocacy. FreeBSD seems to do too much in-fighting in its advocacy list But, I guess that is just growing pains. -Chris Coleman Daemon News Editor in Chief http://www.daemonnews.org > > > -cliff > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9904191641320.4050-100000>