From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 18 05:54:57 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF594E63
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 05:54:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from glory.vmeta.jp (7c2952d4.i-revonet.jp [124.41.82.212])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD882F12
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 05:54:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ssl.vmeta.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by glory.vmeta.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A9527F;
 Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:46:10 +0900 (JST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:46:10 +0900
From: Koichiro IWAO <meta@vmeta.jp>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: single PR vs multiple PR
Message-ID: <59985f9fec5e0c1741281f6a49342a38@vmeta.jp>
X-Sender: meta@vmeta.jp
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 05:54:57 -0000

When maintainer-updating ports, generally, I think one port per one PR
is a good manner.  Do committers mind if I made a single PR such a case
applying quite similar changes to multiple port? Which do comitters 
prefer?

For example:
https://redports.org/changeset?reponame=&new=19778%40meta%2Fnet&old=19668%40meta%2Fnet

Thanks,
-- 
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta <meta@vmeta.jp>