Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:42:06 -0700
From:      "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>
To:        Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org>
Cc:        "A. L. Meyers" <a.l.meyers@consult-meyers.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: is "stable" "stable"?
Message-ID:  <20010721144206.E19014@freeway.dcfinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010721111339.B75328-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org>; from lamont@scriptkiddie.org on Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 11:27:01AM -0700
References:  <20010721182504.L857-100000@nomad.consult-meyers.com> <20010721111339.B75328-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 11:27:01AM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> Why is this so difficult for people to understand?

Oh, please.  Let's not start this thread =again=.  The last one was
less than a month ago.

> *ANY* time you are checking out the head of a development branch (even
> one where developers are supposedly being "more careful") then you
> should expect to occasionally see problems.

Why is it so difficult for people to understand that calling the
head of a development branch "-stable" is just going to invite
problems?

	-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15)   602-953-1392   Brother, can you paradigm?
chad@dcfinc.com         chad@larsons.org          larson1@home.com
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010721144206.E19014>