Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:42:06 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org> Cc: "A. L. Meyers" <a.l.meyers@consult-meyers.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Message-ID: <20010721144206.E19014@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20010721111339.B75328-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org>; from lamont@scriptkiddie.org on Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 11:27:01AM -0700 References: <20010721182504.L857-100000@nomad.consult-meyers.com> <20010721111339.B75328-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 11:27:01AM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote: > Why is this so difficult for people to understand? Oh, please. Let's not start this thread =again=. The last one was less than a month ago. > *ANY* time you are checking out the head of a development branch (even > one where developers are supposedly being "more careful") then you > should expect to occasionally see problems. Why is it so difficult for people to understand that calling the head of a development branch "-stable" is just going to invite problems? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010721144206.E19014>