From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 30 15:32:51 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA02107 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:32:51 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA02101; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:32:48 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id PAA15063; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:32:44 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA00239; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:32:44 -0800 Message-Id: <199503302332.PAA00239@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: jbryant@server.iadfw.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, phk@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: What happened to my include files!@# In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 95 15:26:00 PST." <1807.796605960@freefall.cdrom.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:32:43 -0800 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >At this point, the number of errors in 950322-SNAP has exceeded what I >believe to be acceptable in a snapshot. Sorry, Poul, but that's >really how I feel about it. I think it should be deleted from >wcarchive and freefall since I'm getting very tired of receiving email >about what are some pretty serious bits of broken behavior. It's not >doing our reputation any good at all! :-( > >How do the rest of -hackers feel? Despite the problems with it, I need people to be using it if I'm going to have any chance of fixing the bugs in the kernel. We're not far from another snapshot (which will include a pile more fixes for the merged cache and the new install utilities)... I think we should just leave it out there. Perhaps a few line README file telling people to set the permissions correctly on whatever files would be sufficient. -DG