From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 21:36:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADCD16A4CE; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:36:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B491043D1F; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:36:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9PLaaqZ055919; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:36:36 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9PLaZkV055918; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:36:35 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:36:35 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20041025213635.GA55727@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , Tim Robbins , Jens Schweikhardt , freebsd-standards@freebsd.org References: <200410132000.i9DK0o3O052401@freefall.freebsd.org> <20041013201820.GA26102@nagual.pp.ru> <20041014092108.GA28831@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1; AVE: 6.28.0.7; VDF: 6.28.0.38; host: pobrecita.freebsd.ru) cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org cc: Tim Robbins Subject: Re: standards/54410: one-true-awk not POSIX compliant (no extended REs) X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:36:38 -0000 On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 11:19:12PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Jens, I came up with this patch a while ago and sent it to Andrey in > > private mail: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/awk-re.diff > > that is never going to fly... the patch is too intrusive, it will > make future upgrades a nightmare. I try this patch and it works in simple tests, but I very doubt awk's author will accept it. IMHO better alternative will be to switch back to good old gawk which use GNU regex (POSIXed and well localized too). -- http://ache.pp.ru/