From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 17 02:35:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB65A16A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 02:35:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server2.troikatek.com (server2.troikatek.com [66.135.32.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F0843D1F for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 02:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aheyn@jmsent.com) Received: (qmail 25339 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2005 03:29:42 -0000 Received: from ns.jmsent.com (HELO AREILLPC) (66.9.27.146) by server2.troikatek.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2005 03:29:42 -0000 From: "Andrew Heyn" To: Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:35:50 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: paranoia X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 02:35:54 -0000 Here's an on/off topic question i've been wondering about forever... I always see people replace their IPs with fake replacements. Is this paranoia really warranted? Why not disconnect the cat5 if you want to do this? Or am I not seeing things the right way? Thanks, Andrew