From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Aug 25 02:48:38 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id CAA21044
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 02:48:38 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA21037
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 02:48:36 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id CAA18029; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 02:44:44 -0700
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 02:44:44 -0700
Message-Id: <199508250944.CAA18029@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
CC: mrcpu@cdsnet.net, hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199508250619.IAA01232@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Fri, 25 Aug 1995 08:19:02 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: wu-ftd problem.
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * > ld.so: warning: libc.so.2.1: minor version < 2 expected, using it anyway
 * > ftp> quit
 * 
 * The program has been linked against libc.so.2.2.

That's right, all new ports are linked against 2.2-current.

The original poster said he grabbed the 2.0.5 version though....are
you sure, Jaye?

But anyway, this can't be the reason why it's failing, as I don't
think wu-ftpd uses the new functions.  (And if it does, ld.so should
fail instead of just complaining and starting the program anyway...right?)

Satoshi