From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 3 14:10:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E829106564A; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F578FC13; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so116659iwn.13 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:10:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KQ0b87tz8W6Lh3TTaAhadOq4TEG5IDli9ecWvrAiFcQ=; b=QayrjLg6N/Ic0XXErLQhg6aRxmK0WPnZquB/vSujhQggZ59SVVeQKtn0yAxA46Bdje u6mFCxI47/gBkq2gNXR30tjzj2VUS9cGqpBIy0SuCXkHz7hXiEu1q9PvHmqwLYdvHqXr oF9jHFVXoP4vLtvSIFrG0ydE+QUPlrngzCi2s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=shrQFiN9S8giAc4olb5uHPHTbqemnmRJrqfCxaLrlIzX6HrVLn0QZaCekwYDDwgAw8 V+HGrCA4NMdN+oj9sVUtTo0Xc6Mxsyhlb/uVi85BQ6jnT3VQ8F7zbvidc1fvlmKXL9W3 DaMXYKlP9i3ukz4c/lIv4M/3bx0s87cxhD4/g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.79.4 with SMTP id n4mr3797646ibk.16.1275574239597; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.196 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 07:10:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C0795F2.90004@FreeBSD.org> References: <4C011524.7050806@FreeBSD.org> <4C03B42B.2080206@protected-networks.net> <5bae657843a7c00f05c14c2bed884364@bluelife.at> <201005311906.30257.lobo@bsd.com.br> <4C0795F2.90004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 09:10:39 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Beat Gaetzi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Daichi GOTO Subject: Re: CFT: VirtualBox 3.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:10:41 -0000 On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > Brandon Gooch wrote: >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: >>> On Monday 31 May 2010 15:14:01 Bernhard Froehlich wrote: >>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 09:05:47 -0400, Michael Butler >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 05/31/10 04:55, Anton Berezin wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:01:04AM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: >>>>>>> Memory leaks there I have noticed. Look at follow message of top(1)= : >>>>>> I also experience memory leaks. =A0WinXP guest, amd64-CURRENT (from >>>>>> 2010-05-10) host. =A0100% CPU load when the guest is doing nothing, = and >>>>>> memory >>>>>> usage keeps growing at a rather alarming pace. >>>>> Just an observation - this appears to be related to using the additio= ns >>>>> from 3.2.0. Using VBox 3.2.0 with the 3.1.8 additions doesn't appear = to >>>>> display the leak - no idea what triggers this behaviour, >>>> I've just talked to the virtualbox developers and this is obviously an >>>> known bug in the 3.2.0 additions. As a workaround you can use the 3.1.= 8 >>>> additions and they said it will be fixed with 3.2.2. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>> Actually, this problem doesn't happen up to >>> VBoxGuestAdditions_3.2.0_BETA1.iso. >>> >>> VBoxGuestAdditions_3.2.0_BETA2.iso and newer do have it. >> >> I can confirm this. For the record. > > I've updated the port in our repository to 3.2.2 which should fix the > memory leak. Could you please check if the problem is solved now. Running for about an hour now (Windows 7 32-bit guest) and no leaks detecte= d! Thank you so much! -Brandon