From nobody Thu Jul 24 11:42:09 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bnpyD52SZz62Pqn for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bnpyC6tKpz3kmm for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm2 header.b=m9QIQFpE; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="k dEk5Xb"; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697B61400035 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 07:42:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 24 Jul 2025 07:42:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1753357331; x=1753443731; bh=V9PdNEY0wRYZBUn+icq5KRmhq1F/ufHU XNOffExm89Q=; b=m9QIQFpEKKwlfemVJOJEoJXvpZnQEKeEWz1BLmTOH2SYCvTc Gd3QsPrANmNw9ELZ+IQ88zZ7YDUqTZDLuWkPac72KedrMNdfqiO0TIyUKVkUlQaw snuLS9501+GosbUcS8iIa0X3Mi8uT5RwqM+qswQOBAs95JqS8M2yVdN/x9ajjgMx uh1UH/uZpfSHNUUCMFsK7U1LL5To7uc5yW5IhmVlO/gqfVMYKzLrVcE1BAVzyroO qSTwyve2+JsP89sl4TALtr4MencYGY43M/+mbfD81etTS3SyQDlFiA+8Fr6qrHRh 6HXqnhUh4uO98VYtKSPFyQWyv0uPujDevDPpHQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1753357331; x= 1753443731; bh=V9PdNEY0wRYZBUn+icq5KRmhq1F/ufHUXNOffExm89Q=; b=k dEk5XbggoMcVNA9JXzz19nSKW95WvYTDw9NAqj7ufkRpujJzLCWGZ9iHnG4jsugo yKC3oGOZ1RHTXQJDHblPmG8MF1L+43u4t4pkrINTKVYzfpkApxqxz1+9FnfEEx+f Ecc3DrvXbU15uvd5XkiG3RYgBXcY+o/TehaLgwSgqIQkjvKHnIDGhsEBLQFKbXpu KaM+EoCOEOVOlpCgprErR98eojwOzA8lfX45q9xxAalP3cco9ABRphJdxTqj6Tlx FAJJqBH/Xh0744783elq8LDTTu0rRQY1xeWtSJu2k5s+btfMh8UrNenUgOvoKBTB KxkcyDgo+MYfxIKeTelwA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdektdehiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggusehttdertddttddvne cuhfhrohhmpehvohhiugcuoehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhn peevudffiedvffffgffhgeefjeefffdtieetheetkeefhfdvfefgtedtueehgeffueenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehvohhiuges fhdqmhdrfhhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtph htthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhnvghtsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 07:42:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 12:42:09 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: about cloned_interfaces in /etc/rc.conf Message-ID: List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.40 / 15.00]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.995]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.83)[0.825]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.82)[-0.823]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.152:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:151847, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:AU]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4bnpyC6tKpz3kmm X-Spamd-Bar: / Hi net@, I'd like two bridges on a dual NIC system running -current. If it had a single bridge, it would be like (snip) cloned_interfaces="bridge0 tap0 tap1" (snip) But if there's two bridges, different networks (one routable, one not) then is (snip) cloned_interfaces="bridge0 bridge1 tap0 tap1 tap2 tap3" correct? --