Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Apr 2000 15:36:31 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Anatoly Vorobey <mellon@pobox.com>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: memory in the kernel 
Message-ID:  <4887.955892191@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:30:38 -0000." <20000416123037.A24869@happy.checkpoint.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000416123037.A24869@happy.checkpoint.com>, Anatoly Vorobey writes
:
>I have to malloc a lot of memory in the kernel, hence a few
>questions:

How much is "a lot" ?

>1. The data must be absolutely present at all times, no page
>faults or locking mechanisms, etc. Does that mean
>I should use kmem_alloc_wired() or am I misunderstanding its purpose?
>Does it make sense to alloc less than a pageful or is the rest simply
>going to be wasted?

malloc(9) should be used.

>
>2. Unfortunately, I need to realloc a lot as data is dynamic and I
>don't know sizes beforehand. How do I do that? Do I malloc a new
>region, copy manually and release the old one?

Yes, we have no realloc(9).

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4887.955892191>